Framler
Signal Feed
WatchlistTrack Record
⌕
LIVE
Framler · © 2026
Engine
MethodologySectorsPatternsCompareAlternativesScreenersGlossaryTrack RecordSleeve P&LShort SqueezeTop Rated
Research moat
MoatResearchCase Study: NVDA
Company
InvestorsPressBlogChangelogRoadmapAPIAboutContact
FEATURED ANALYSISNVDATSLAAAPLAMDMSFTMETA
Framler is a quantitative research platform - not a broker, investment advisor, or fiduciary. Nothing on this site constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. All model outputs - scores, verdicts, intervals, predictions - are for informational and educational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Invest at your own risk. Built on public data - SEC EDGAR, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Yahoo Finance, Finnhub, FMP.
TRUSTThe BetLedgerStatusSecurity·LEGALTermsPrivacyDisclaimer
← MC.PA FULL ANALYSIS

LVMH Moët Hennessy (MC.PA) Forecast

Consumer Cyclical€460.00-1.06%

Framler has scored LVMH Moët Hennessy daily since May 5 — 73 published scores, of which 68 are old enough to be graded against what the stock actually did next. Both are below, unfiltered.

45mixed
FRAMLER SCORE · /100
Prediction Interval
Score: 45(90%-target range: 5–94 · agreement 47%)

Our daily score for MC.PA — last 73 published days

LEANS BULLISHNO STRONG CALLLEANS BEARISH0204060801002026-05-05 score 572026-05-06 score 572026-05-07 score 592026-05-08 score 602026-05-11 score 462026-05-12 score 462026-05-13 score 442026-05-14 score 442026-05-15 score 442026-05-18 score 442026-05-19 score 482026-05-20 score 442026-05-21 score 452026-05-22 score 562026-05-25 score 542026-05-26 score 442026-05-27 score 452026-05-28 score 442026-05-29 score 552026-06-01 score 582026-06-02 score 602026-06-03 score 602026-06-04 score 462026-06-05 score 442026-06-08 score 602026-06-09 score 592026-06-10 score 582026-06-11 score 552026-06-12 score 552026-06-15 score 672026-06-16 score 462026-06-17 score 612026-06-18 score 562026-06-19 score 572026-06-22 score 472026-06-23 score 462026-06-24 score 552026-06-25 score 552026-06-26 score 622026-06-29 score 462026-06-30 score 472026-07-01 score 452026-07-02 score 442026-07-03 score 452026-07-06 score 462026-07-07 score 472026-07-08 score 462026-07-09 score 482026-07-10 score 512026-07-13 score 452026-07-14 score 462026-07-15 score 452026-07-16 score 462026-07-17 score 512026-07-20 score 512026-07-21 score 462026-07-22 score 472026-07-23 score 442026-07-24 score 512026-07-27 score 512026-07-28 score 552026-07-29 score 532026-07-30 score 412026-07-31 score 492026-08-03 score 492026-08-04 score 532026-08-05 score 482026-08-06 score 462026-08-07 score 582026-08-10 score 592026-08-11 score 442026-08-12 score 462026-08-13 score 45May 5Aug 13

The purple line is the 0–100 score we published for MC.PA each day. In the green zone (above 60) the model leans bullish; in the red zone (below 40) it leans bearish; in between it isn't making a strong call. 66 of these 73 days sat in the middle zone — the model has not made a strong call on this stock recently. Every point is committed to a public, Bitcoin-anchored ledger — we can't quietly rewrite a bad call.

Were we right on MC.PA? — 68 graded days

WE MADE A CALL ON 7 OF 68 DAYS — RIGHT 3 · WRONG 4

Why so much grey? The score only takes a side when enough of the 13 factors agree on a direction. On MC.PA they have mostly pointed different ways and cancelled each other out, so the honest output was “no call” — the model doesn't manufacture an opinion to have one. Nothing is missing here: across all 1,001 stocks about a third of graded days carry a call; this stock just hasn't been one of them lately.

-5%0%+5%2026-05-05: no call (score 57) — stock went +0.47% over the next 7 days2026-05-06: no call (score 57) — stock went +0.30% over the next 7 days2026-05-07: no call (score 59) — stock went -2.77% over the next 7 days2026-05-08: we said UP (score 60), stock went -4.75% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-05-11: no call (score 46) — stock went +1.11% over the next 7 days2026-05-12: no call (score 46) — stock went +2.21% over the next 7 days2026-05-13: no call (score 44) — stock went +4.75% over the next 7 days2026-05-14: no call (score 44) — stock went +4.70% over the next 7 days
Current RegimeTRANSITION

Markets are shifting between regimes. Factor leadership is rotating; signals may be noisier than usual.

Why there is no price target here

Most forecast sites will print an exact price for MC.PA a year out. We won't: a point target is a guess dressed up as precision. What we publish instead is a 0–100 ranking score with an honest uncertainty range, a daily record of every score we've ever published (anchored in Bitcoin, so it can't be edited after the fact), and a pre-registered public bet on whether the score ranks stocks better than chance. If the model is wrong, this page will say so — that's the product.

View full MC.PA analysis — factor breakdown, forward returns, news →
Model-generated forecast based on 13 academic factors. Not investment advice. See methodology for how the Framler score is built.
2026-05-15: no call (score 44) — stock went +2.55% over the next 7 days2026-05-18: no call (score 44) — stock went +4.89% over the next 7 days2026-05-19: no call (score 48) — stock went +2.84% over the next 7 days2026-05-20: no call (score 44) — stock went +4.75% over the next 7 days2026-05-21: no call (score 45) — stock went +1.51% over the next 7 days2026-05-22: no call (score 56) — stock went -0.11% over the next 7 days2026-05-25: no call (score 54) — stock went -0.59% over the next 7 days2026-05-26: no call (score 44) — stock went -0.61% over the next 7 days2026-05-27: no call (score 45) — stock went -1.78% over the next 7 days2026-05-28: no call (score 44) — stock went -2.04% over the next 7 days2026-05-29: no call (score 55) — stock went -0.40% over the next 7 days2026-06-01: no call (score 58) — stock went +1.99% over the next 7 days2026-06-02: we said UP (score 60), stock went +4.79% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-03: we said UP (score 60), stock went +2.66% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-04: no call (score 46) — stock went +7.02% over the next 7 days2026-06-05: no call (score 44) — stock went +7.70% over the next 7 days2026-06-08: we said UP (score 60), stock went +7.00% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-09: no call (score 59) — stock went +7.85% over the next 7 days2026-06-10: no call (score 58) — stock went +3.80% over the next 7 days2026-06-11: no call (score 55) — stock went +3.58% over the next 7 days2026-06-12: no call (score 55) — stock went +1.23% over the next 7 days2026-06-15: we said UP (score 67), stock went -5.73% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-06-16: no call (score 46) — stock went -5.64% over the next 7 days2026-06-17: we said UP (score 61), stock went -5.25% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-06-18: no call (score 56) — stock went -3.25% over the next 7 days2026-06-19: no call (score 57) — stock went -1.85% over the next 7 days2026-06-22: no call (score 47) — stock went -1.32% over the next 7 days2026-06-23: no call (score 46) — stock went +1.78% over the next 7 days2026-06-24: no call (score 55) — stock went -0.76% over the next 7 days2026-06-25: no call (score 55) — stock went -1.01% over the next 7 days2026-06-26: we said UP (score 62), stock went +0.00% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-06-29: no call (score 46) — stock went +1.14% over the next 7 days2026-06-30: no call (score 47) — stock went +1.22% over the next 7 days2026-07-01: no call (score 45) — stock went +1.62% over the next 7 days2026-07-02: no call (score 44) — stock went +1.80% over the next 7 days2026-07-03: no call (score 45) — stock went -0.93% over the next 7 days2026-07-06: no call (score 46) — stock went -1.58% over the next 7 days2026-07-07: no call (score 47) — stock went -2.10% over the next 7 days2026-07-08: no call (score 46) — stock went -0.19% over the next 7 days2026-07-09: no call (score 48) — stock went +1.79% over the next 7 days2026-07-10: no call (score 51) — stock went +1.43% over the next 7 days2026-07-13: no call (score 45) — stock went +0.80% over the next 7 days2026-07-14: no call (score 46) — stock went -1.51% over the next 7 days2026-07-15: no call (score 45) — stock went -4.53% over the next 7 days2026-07-16: no call (score 46) — stock went -6.44% over the next 7 days2026-07-17: no call (score 51) — stock went -8.32% over the next 7 days2026-07-20: no call (score 51) — stock went -5.64% over the next 7 days2026-07-21: no call (score 46) — stock went -2.16% over the next 7 days2026-07-22: no call (score 47) — stock went +1.96% over the next 7 days2026-07-23: no call (score 44) — stock went -0.60% over the next 7 days2026-07-24: no call (score 51) — stock went +4.80% over the next 7 days2026-07-27: no call (score 51) — stock went +4.42% over the next 7 days2026-07-28: no call (score 55) — stock went +4.66% over the next 7 days2026-07-29: no call (score 53) — stock went +1.13% over the next 7 days2026-07-30: no call (score 41) — stock went +2.60% over the next 7 days2026-07-31: no call (score 49) — stock went +1.37% over the next 7 days2026-08-03: no call (score 49) — stock went +2.04% over the next 7 days2026-08-04: no call (score 53) — stock went +1.39% over the next 7 days2026-08-05: no call (score 48) — stock went -1.83% over the next 7 days2026-08-06: no call (score 46) — stock went -4.02% over the next 7 daysMay 5Aug 6
we made a call and were rightwe made a call and were wrongno call that day

Each bar is what MC.PA actually did over the 7 days after one of our published scores — up bars, the stock rose; down bars, it fell. A “call” is a day the score left the middle zone (above 60 = we said up, below 40 = we said down), and it's counted right only if the stock then moved our way. Faint bars are days we made no call — saying “we don't know” is allowed here. These are raw counts on one stock, far too few to prove skill either way — the serious, pre-registered test across all 1,001 stocks is the public bet.