Framler
Signal Feed
WatchlistTrack Record
⌕
LIVE
Framler · © 2026
Engine
MethodologySectorsPatternsCompareAlternativesScreenersGlossaryTrack RecordSleeve P&LShort SqueezeTop Rated
Research moat
MoatResearchCase Study: NVDA
Company
InvestorsPressBlogChangelogRoadmapAPIAboutContact
FEATURED ANALYSISNVDATSLAAAPLAMDMSFTMETA
Framler is a quantitative research platform - not a broker, investment advisor, or fiduciary. Nothing on this site constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. All model outputs - scores, verdicts, intervals, predictions - are for informational and educational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Invest at your own risk. Built on public data - SEC EDGAR, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Yahoo Finance, Finnhub, FMP.
TRUSTThe BetLedgerStatusSecurity·LEGALTermsPrivacyDisclaimer
← CLS FULL ANALYSIS

Celestica Inc. (CLS) Forecast

Technology$302.00+0.21%

Framler has scored Celestica Inc. daily since May 11 — 74 published scores, of which 68 are old enough to be graded against what the stock actually did next. Both are below, unfiltered.

34mixed
FRAMLER SCORE · /100
Prediction Interval
Score: 34(90%-target range: 5–84 · agreement 55%)

Our daily score for CLS — last 74 published days

LEANS BULLISHNO STRONG CALLLEANS BEARISH0204060801002026-05-11 score 372026-05-12 score 372026-05-13 score 572026-05-14 score 572026-05-15 score 582026-05-18 score 372026-05-19 score 412026-05-20 score 312026-05-21 score 592026-05-22 score 562026-05-25 score 592026-05-26 score 372026-05-27 score 382026-05-28 score 382026-05-29 score 472026-06-01 score 502026-06-02 score 372026-06-03 score 582026-06-04 score 602026-06-05 score 302026-06-08 score 332026-06-09 score 442026-06-10 score 592026-06-11 score 592026-06-12 score 302026-06-15 score 602026-06-16 score 382026-06-17 score 372026-06-18 score 452026-06-19 score 312026-06-22 score 342026-06-23 score 322026-06-24 score 482026-06-25 score 492026-06-26 score 552026-06-29 score 492026-06-30 score 382026-07-01 score 592026-07-02 score 382026-07-03 score 562026-07-06 score 372026-07-07 score 342026-07-08 score 572026-07-09 score 482026-07-10 score 372026-07-13 score 522026-07-14 score 502026-07-15 score 332026-07-16 score 352026-07-17 score 462026-07-20 score 462026-07-21 score 342026-07-22 score 372026-07-23 score 632026-07-24 score 332026-07-27 score 332026-07-28 score 622026-07-29 score 722026-07-30 score 492026-07-31 score 352026-08-03 score 352026-08-04 score 732026-08-05 score 762026-08-06 score 562026-08-07 score 482026-08-10 score 762026-08-11 score 532026-08-12 score 342026-08-13 score 742026-08-14 score 742026-08-17 score 442026-08-18 score 842026-08-19 score 462026-08-20 score 34May 11Aug 20

The purple line is the 0–100 score we published for CLS each day. In the green zone (above 60) the model leans bullish; in the red zone (below 40) it leans bearish; in between it isn't making a strong call. 32 of these 74 days sat in the middle zone — the model has not made a strong call on this stock recently. Every point is committed to a public, Bitcoin-anchored ledger — we can't quietly rewrite a bad call.

Were we right on CLS? — 68 graded days

WE MADE A CALL ON 38 OF 68 DAYS — RIGHT 24 · WRONG 14
-20%-15%-10%-5%0%+5%+10%+15%+20%+25%2026-05-11: we said DOWN (score 37), stock went -11.11% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-05-12: we said DOWN (score 37), stock went -10.99% over the next 7 days — RIGHT
Current RegimeRISK ON

Markets are in an expansionary regime. Momentum and growth factors tend to perform well.

What the factors say

BULLISH FACTORS
Earnings DriftSTRONG
Options FlowSTRONG
Sector MomentumGOOD
BEARISH FACTORS
NLP TonePOOR
Sector SpilloverWEAK

Why there is no price target here

Most forecast sites will print an exact price for CLS a year out. We won't: a point target is a guess dressed up as precision. What we publish instead is a 0–100 ranking score with an honest uncertainty range, a daily record of every score we've ever published (anchored in Bitcoin, so it can't be edited after the fact), and a pre-registered public bet on whether the score ranks stocks better than chance. If the model is wrong, this page will say so — that's the product.

View full CLS analysis — factor breakdown, forward returns, news →
Model-generated forecast based on 13 academic factors. Not investment advice. See methodology for how the Framler score is built.
2026-05-13: no call (score 57) — stock went -6.42% over the next 7 days2026-05-14: no call (score 57) — stock went -4.77% over the next 7 days2026-05-15: no call (score 58) — stock went -3.73% over the next 7 days2026-05-18: we said DOWN (score 37), stock went +3.43% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-05-19: no call (score 41) — stock went +8.22% over the next 7 days2026-05-20: we said DOWN (score 31), stock went +5.48% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-05-21: no call (score 59) — stock went +1.31% over the next 7 days2026-05-22: no call (score 56) — stock went +8.63% over the next 7 days2026-05-25: no call (score 59) — stock went +16.11% over the next 7 days2026-05-26: we said DOWN (score 37), stock went +28.59% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-05-27: we said DOWN (score 38), stock went +23.54% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-05-28: we said DOWN (score 38), stock went +18.92% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-05-29: no call (score 47) — stock went +5.89% over the next 7 days2026-06-01: no call (score 50) — stock went +0.29% over the next 7 days2026-06-02: we said DOWN (score 37), stock went -12.82% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-03: no call (score 58) — stock went -23.18% over the next 7 days2026-06-04: we said UP (score 60), stock went -15.78% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-06-05: we said DOWN (score 30), stock went -7.58% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-08: we said DOWN (score 33), stock went +8.54% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-06-09: no call (score 44) — stock went -1.16% over the next 7 days2026-06-10: no call (score 59) — stock went +2.29% over the next 7 days2026-06-11: no call (score 59) — stock went +2.65% over the next 7 days2026-06-12: we said DOWN (score 30), stock went -2.34% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-15: we said UP (score 60), stock went -4.14% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-06-16: we said DOWN (score 38), stock went -12.95% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-17: we said DOWN (score 37), stock went -5.18% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-18: no call (score 45) — stock went -4.99% over the next 7 days2026-06-19: we said DOWN (score 31), stock went -9.40% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-22: we said DOWN (score 34), stock went -7.86% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-23: we said DOWN (score 32), stock went -3.19% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-06-24: no call (score 48) — stock went +2.97% over the next 7 days2026-06-25: no call (score 49) — stock went -7.19% over the next 7 days2026-06-26: no call (score 55) — stock went -3.10% over the next 7 days2026-06-29: no call (score 49) — stock went +3.75% over the next 7 days2026-06-30: we said DOWN (score 38), stock went +0.53% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-07-01: no call (score 59) — stock went -1.11% over the next 7 days2026-07-02: we said DOWN (score 38), stock went -1.89% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-07-03: no call (score 56) — stock went +7.03% over the next 7 days2026-07-06: we said DOWN (score 37), stock went +2.67% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-07-07: we said DOWN (score 34), stock went -1.78% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-07-08: no call (score 57) — stock went -0.31% over the next 7 days2026-07-09: no call (score 48) — stock went -15.77% over the next 7 days2026-07-10: we said DOWN (score 37), stock went -15.06% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-07-13: no call (score 52) — stock went -14.59% over the next 7 days2026-07-14: no call (score 50) — stock went -1.62% over the next 7 days2026-07-15: we said DOWN (score 33), stock went -2.76% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-07-16: we said DOWN (score 35), stock went -0.01% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-07-17: no call (score 46) — stock went +0.47% over the next 7 days2026-07-20: no call (score 46) — stock went +5.61% over the next 7 days2026-07-21: we said DOWN (score 34), stock went +13.95% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-07-22: we said DOWN (score 37), stock went -3.29% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-07-23: we said UP (score 63), stock went +5.09% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-07-24: we said DOWN (score 33), stock went -0.99% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-07-27: we said DOWN (score 33), stock went +12.00% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-07-28: we said UP (score 62), stock went +16.63% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-07-29: we said UP (score 72), stock went +3.59% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-07-30: no call (score 49) — stock went -4.23% over the next 7 days2026-07-31: we said DOWN (score 35), stock went -9.86% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-08-03: we said DOWN (score 35), stock went -5.08% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-08-04: we said UP (score 73), stock went -9.22% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-08-05: we said UP (score 76), stock went -8.54% over the next 7 days — WRONG2026-08-06: no call (score 56) — stock went -4.17% over the next 7 days2026-08-07: no call (score 48) — stock went +6.52% over the next 7 days2026-08-10: we said UP (score 76), stock went +7.10% over the next 7 days — RIGHT2026-08-11: no call (score 53) — stock went -1.27% over the next 7 days2026-08-12: we said DOWN (score 34), stock went -2.91% over the next 7 days — RIGHTMay 11Aug 12
we made a call and were rightwe made a call and were wrongno call that day

Each bar is what CLS actually did over the 7 days after one of our published scores — up bars, the stock rose; down bars, it fell. A “call” is a day the score left the middle zone (above 60 = we said up, below 40 = we said down), and it's counted right only if the stock then moved our way. Faint bars are days we made no call — saying “we don't know” is allowed here. These are raw counts on one stock, far too few to prove skill either way — the serious, pre-registered test across all 1,001 stocks is the public bet.