PINS vs RDDT — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
PINS and RDDT diverge most on accruals (PINS 88 vs 65) and PEAD drift (PINS 78 vs 56). They are most aligned on sector momentum (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

PINSRDDT
Metric
PINS
Communication
RDDT
Communication
Framler score
56
[1095]
68
[2295]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternPIOTROSKI HIGHPIOTROSKI HIGH
Price change-0.16%-5.27%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALGOOD
ValueGOODGOOD
MomentumWEAKWEAK
PEADSTRONGGOOD
InsiderPOORPOOR
NLP toneWEAKNEUTRAL
Short int.STRONGGOOD
Options flowGOODNEUTRAL
SpilloverPOORPOOR
AccrualsSTRONGGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).