MRVL vs QCOM — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
MRVL and QCOM diverge most on accruals (QCOM 89 vs 37) and options flow (QCOM 92 vs 57). They are most aligned on Q×V×M (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

MRVLQCOM
Metric
MRVL
Semiconductors
QCOM
Semiconductors
Framler score
43
[589]
61
[1595]
Verdictmixedbullish
RegimeROTX
PatternDIVERGENCECONFIRMED BEAT
Price change+5.97%+3.53%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALGOOD
ValueNEUTRALWEAK
MomentumSTRONGGOOD
PEADNEUTRALGOOD
InsiderPOORPOOR
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowGOODSTRONG
SpilloverSTRONGSTRONG
AccrualsWEAKSTRONG
Sector mom.STRONGSTRONG
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).