LLY vs NVO — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
LLY and NVO diverge most on insider flow (NVO 50 vs 10) and NLP tone (NVO 29 vs 0). They are most aligned on PEAD drift (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

LLYNVO
Metric
LLY
Healthcare
NVO
Healthcare
Framler score
86
[4095]
59
[1395]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeROTX
PatternCONFIRMED BEAT
Phase 3 riskPH3·75%PH3·62%
Price change-0.25%+1.78%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGSTRONG
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODNEUTRAL
PEADSTRONGSTRONG
InsiderPOORNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALWEAK
Options flowSTRONGSTRONG
SpilloverGOODSTRONG
AccrualsWEAKNEUTRAL
Sector mom.GOODGOOD
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).