CTVA vs FCX — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CTVA and FCX diverge most on options flow (CTVA 82 vs 38) and spillover (FCX 50 vs 15). They are most aligned on PEAD drift (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CTVAFCX
Metric
CTVA
Materials
FCX
Materials
Framler score
58
[1295]
53
[795]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternCONTRARIAN LONG
Price change-0.24%+3.70%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODGOOD
ValueGOODNEUTRAL
MomentumWEAKNEUTRAL
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowSTRONGWEAK
SpilloverPOORNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.POORPOOR
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).