CLF vs CTVA — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CLF and CTVA diverge most on quality (CTVA 59 vs 18) and short interest (CTVA 52 vs 28). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CLFCTVA
Metric
CLF
Materials
CTVA
Materials
Framler score
43
[589]
58
[1295]
Verdictmixedbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternCONTRARIAN LONG
Price change+1.87%-0.24%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityPOORGOOD
ValueNEUTRALGOOD
MomentumWEAKWEAK
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.STRONGNEUTRAL
Options flowGOODSTRONG
SpilloverPOORPOOR
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.POORPOOR
Q × V × MGOODNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).