AME vs BLDR — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AME and BLDR diverge most on momentum (AME 51 vs 16) and PEAD drift (AME 58 vs 34). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AMEBLDR
Metric
AME
Industrials
BLDR
Industrials
Framler score
53
[795]
43
[589]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change+1.55%+7.29%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODNEUTRAL
ValueGOODWEAK
MomentumNEUTRALPOOR
PEADGOODWEAK
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOOR
Short int.NEUTRALGOOD
Options flowSTRONGSTRONG
SpilloverPOORPOOR
AccrualsGOODSTRONG
Sector mom.WEAKPOOR
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).