AAL vs AME — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AAL and AME diverge most on options flow (AME 81 vs 52) and short interest (AME 54 vs 34). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AALAME
Metric
AAL
Industrials
AME
Industrials
Framler score
48
[594]
53
[795]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change+7.38%+1.55%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALGOOD
ValueGOODGOOD
MomentumNEUTRALNEUTRAL
PEADNEUTRALGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.GOODNEUTRAL
Options flowNEUTRALSTRONG
SpilloverPOORPOOR
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).