UNH vs CVS — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
UNH and CVS diverge most on options flow (UNH 54 vs 44) and PEAD drift (CVS 65 vs 59). They are most aligned on Q×V×M (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

UNHCVS
Metric
UNH
Healthcare
CVS
Healthcare
Framler score
50
[595]
52
[695]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeRORO
Pattern
Price change-1.53%-0.96%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityWEAKWEAK
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumWEAKWEAK
PEADGOODGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowNEUTRALWEAK
SpilloverSTRONGSTRONG
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.GOODGOOD
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).