LRCX vs AMAT — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
LRCX and AMAT diverge most on accruals (AMAT 58 vs 32) and PEAD drift (LRCX 65 vs 50). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

LRCXAMAT
Metric
LRCX
Semiconductors
AMAT
Semiconductors
Framler score
43
[593]
48
[595]
Verdictbearishbearish
RegimeTXTX
PatternEARNINGS QUALITY
Price change+1.09%+0.12%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODGOOD
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumWEAKNEUTRAL
PEADGOODNEUTRAL
InsiderPOORPOOR
NLP toneNEUTRALGOOD
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowSTRONGGOOD
SpilloverPOORPOOR
AccrualsWEAKGOOD
Sector mom.POORPOOR
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).