KLAC vs LRCX — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
KLAC and LRCX diverge most on momentum (KLAC 82 vs 62) and NLP tone (LRCX 56 vs 44). They are most aligned on short interest (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

KLACLRCX
Metric
KLAC
Semiconductors
LRCX
Semiconductors
Framler score
42
[5–95]
37
[5–90]
Verdictbearishmixed
RegimeRORO
PatternACCRUALS REDACCRUALS RED
Price change+3.27%+2.17%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODGOOD
ValueWEAKWEAK
MomentumSTRONGGOOD
PEADGOODGOOD
InsiderPOORPOOR
NLP toneWEAKGOOD
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowGOODNEUTRAL
SpilloverSTRONGSTRONG
AccrualsWEAKWEAK
Sector mom.STRONGSTRONG
Q × V × MGOODGOOD

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).