KLAC vs LRCX — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
KLAC and LRCX diverge most on NLP tone (LRCX 25 vs 0) and insider flow (LRCX 27 vs 14). They are most aligned on short interest (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

KLACLRCX
Metric
KLAC
Semiconductors
LRCX
Semiconductors
Framler score
56
[1095]
59
[1395]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeRORO
PatternCOMPOUNDER
Price change+5.11%+6.84%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODGOOD
ValueWEAKNEUTRAL
MomentumSTRONGSTRONG
PEADNEUTRALGOOD
InsiderPOORPOOR
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowNEUTRALNEUTRAL
SpilloverSTRONGSTRONG
AccrualsNEUTRALGOOD
Sector mom.STRONGSTRONG
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).