EA vs FUBO — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
EA and FUBO diverge most on options flow (FUBO 77 vs 0) and quality (EA 66 vs 18). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

EAFUBO
Metric
EA
Communication Services
FUBO
Communication Services
Framler score
51
[595]
44
[590]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternMIXED
Price change-0.05%-0.43%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODPOOR
ValueNEUTRALSTRONG
MomentumGOODNEUTRAL
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP toneNEUTRALPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALSTRONG
Options flowPOORSTRONG
SpilloverPOORPOOR
AccrualsSTRONGSTRONG
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).