CPB vs DG — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CPB and DG diverge most on PEAD drift (DG 61 vs 28) and short interest (DG 50 vs 22). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CPBDG
Metric
CPB
Consumer Defensive
DG
Consumer Defensive
Framler score
44
[590]
62
[1695]
Verdictbearishbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternCONFIRMED BEAT
Price change-1.04%+1.09%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALGOOD
ValueWEAKNEUTRAL
MomentumPOORNEUTRAL
PEADPOORGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.STRONGNEUTRAL
Options flowSTRONGGOOD
SpilloverNEUTRALNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODSTRONG
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).