COST vs WMT — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
COST and WMT diverge most on insider flow (COST 49 vs 10) and NLP tone (WMT 57 vs 23). They are most aligned on short interest (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

COSTWMT
Metric
COST
Consumer
WMT
Consumer
Framler score
49
[595]
48
[595]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeRORO
Pattern
Price change-2.45%-9.15%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityWEAKWEAK
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumWEAKWEAK
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALPOOR
NLP tonePOORGOOD
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowNEUTRALGOOD
SpilloverSTRONGSTRONG
AccrualsSTRONGSTRONG
Sector mom.STRONGSTRONG
Q × V × MNEUTRALWEAK

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).