CMS vs CNP — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CMS and CNP diverge most on short interest (CMS 60 vs 41) and options flow (CMS 82 vs 71). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CMSCNP
Metric
CMS
Utilities
CNP
Utilities
Framler score
55
[995]
63
[1795]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternSQUEEZE SETUP
Price change-0.49%-0.61%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityWEAKWEAK
ValueWEAKWEAK
MomentumSTRONGGOOD
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.WEAKGOOD
Options flowSTRONGSTRONG
SpilloverNEUTRALNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.STRONGSTRONG
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).