CMG vs COST — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CMG and COST diverge most on options flow (COST 25 vs 1) and momentum (CMG 58 vs 38). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CMGCOST
Metric
CMG
Consumer
COST
Consumer
Framler score
51
[595]
50
[595]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeRORO
Pattern
Price change-0.24%-1.86%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALNEUTRAL
ValueWEAKNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODWEAK
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowPOORPOOR
SpilloverSTRONGSTRONG
AccrualsGOODSTRONG
Sector mom.STRONGSTRONG
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).