CLF vs GOLD — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CLF and GOLD diverge most on NLP tone (GOLD 40 vs 0) and insider flow (GOLD 90 vs 50). They are most aligned on PEAD drift (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CLFGOLD
Metric
CLF
Materials
GOLD
Materials
Framler score
43
[589]
71
[2595]
Verdictmixedbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternSQUEEZE SETUP
Price change+1.87%+3.88%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityPOORPOOR
ValueNEUTRALGOOD
MomentumWEAKGOOD
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALSTRONG
NLP tonePOORWEAK
Short int.STRONGGOOD
Options flowGOODSTRONG
SpilloverPOORNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.POORPOOR
Q × V × MGOODNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).