CLF vs DD — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CLF and DD diverge most on options flow (CLF 65 vs 39) and short interest (DD 52 vs 28). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CLFDD
Metric
CLF
Materials
DD
Materials
Framler score
43
[589]
43
[589]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change+1.87%+1.48%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityPOORWEAK
ValueNEUTRALGOOD
MomentumWEAKWEAK
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.STRONGNEUTRAL
Options flowGOODWEAK
SpilloverPOORPOOR
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.POORPOOR
Q × V × MGOODNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).