CL vs CPNG — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CL and CPNG diverge most on options flow (CPNG 76 vs 33) and insider flow (CPNG 90 vs 50). They are most aligned on short interest (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CLCPNG
Metric
CL
Consumer
CPNG
Consumer
Framler score
49
[595]
51
[595]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change+0.37%+2.36%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODWEAK
ValueWEAKWEAK
MomentumGOODNEUTRAL
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALSTRONG
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowWEAKSTRONG
SpilloverPOORNEUTRAL
AccrualsSTRONGSTRONG
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).