CHTR vs SNAP — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CHTR and SNAP diverge most on insider flow (CHTR 68 vs 10) and options flow (CHTR 74 vs 27). They are most aligned on sector momentum (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CHTRSNAP
Metric
CHTR
Communication
SNAP
Communication
Framler score
50
[595]
42
[588]
Verdictmixedbearish
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change+1.48%+1.26%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODWEAK
ValueWEAKWEAK
MomentumGOODNEUTRAL
PEADWEAKNEUTRAL
InsiderGOODPOOR
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.STRONGGOOD
Options flowSTRONGPOOR
SpilloverPOORPOOR
AccrualsSTRONGSTRONG
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).