CHD vs CMG — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CHD and CMG diverge most on spillover (CMG 85 vs 31) and sector momentum (CMG 71 vs 42). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CHDCMG
Metric
CHD
Consumer
CMG
Consumer
Framler score
55
[995]
51
[595]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXRO
PatternNO EDGE
Price change+0.39%-0.24%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODNEUTRAL
ValueNEUTRALWEAK
MomentumWEAKGOOD
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowPOORPOOR
SpilloverWEAKSTRONG
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKSTRONG
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).