CELH vs CPB — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CELH and CPB diverge most on PEAD drift (CELH 57 vs 28) and value (CELH 61 vs 39). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CELHCPB
Metric
CELH
Consumer Defensive
CPB
Consumer Defensive
Framler score
54
[895]
44
[590]
Verdictbullishbearish
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change-1.72%-1.04%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODNEUTRAL
ValueGOODWEAK
MomentumWEAKPOOR
PEADGOODPOOR
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.GOODSTRONG
Options flowSTRONGSTRONG
SpilloverNEUTRALNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.NEUTRALWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).