CEG vs CNR — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CEG and CNR diverge most on NLP tone (CNR 23 vs 0) and insider flow (CEG 50 vs 34). They are most aligned on sector momentum (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CEGCNR
Metric
CEG
Energy
CNR
Energy
Framler score
52
[695]
50
[595]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change+7.90%-0.92%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALWEAK
ValueGOODGOOD
MomentumGOODGOOD
PEADGOODNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALWEAK
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALGOOD
Options flowWEAKWEAK
SpilloverGOODGOOD
AccrualsGOODSTRONG
Sector mom.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).