CEG vs CHRD — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CEG and CHRD diverge most on options flow (CHRD 82 vs 39) and accruals (CHRD 87 vs 60). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CEGCHRD
Metric
CEG
Energy
CHRD
Energy
Framler score
52
[695]
61
[1595]
Verdictmixedbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternSQUEEZE SETUP
Price change+7.90%-2.74%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALWEAK
ValueGOODSTRONG
MomentumGOODGOOD
PEADGOODNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALGOOD
Options flowWEAKSTRONG
SpilloverGOODNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODSTRONG
Sector mom.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).