CAG vs DG — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
CAG and DG diverge most on options flow (CAG 79 vs 55) and short interest (DG 50 vs 33). They are most aligned on Q×V×M (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

CAGDG
Metric
CAG
Consumer Defensive
DG
Consumer Defensive
Framler score
79
[3395]
62
[1695]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternSQUEEZE SETUPCONFIRMED BEAT
Price change-1.22%+1.09%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALGOOD
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODNEUTRAL
PEADNEUTRALGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.GOODNEUTRAL
Options flowSTRONGGOOD
SpilloverNEUTRALNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODSTRONG
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).