BKNG vs COST — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
BKNG and COST diverge most on spillover (COST 85 vs 35) and insider flow (COST 48 vs 10). They are most aligned on Q×V×M (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

BKNGCOST
Metric
BKNG
Consumer
COST
Consumer
Framler score
66
[2095]
50
[595]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeTXRO
PatternPIOTROSKI HIGH
Price change+1.56%-1.86%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGNEUTRAL
ValueGOODNEUTRAL
MomentumNEUTRALWEAK
PEADGOODNEUTRAL
InsiderPOORNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowGOODPOOR
SpilloverWEAKSTRONG
AccrualsSTRONGSTRONG
Sector mom.WEAKSTRONG
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).