BKNG vs CHD — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
BKNG and CHD diverge most on options flow (BKNG 58 vs 2) and insider flow (CHD 48 vs 10). They are most aligned on NLP tone (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

BKNGCHD
Metric
BKNG
Consumer
CHD
Consumer
Framler score
66
[2095]
55
[995]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternPIOTROSKI HIGHNO EDGE
Price change+1.56%+0.39%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGGOOD
ValueGOODNEUTRAL
MomentumNEUTRALWEAK
PEADGOODNEUTRAL
InsiderPOORNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowGOODPOOR
SpilloverWEAKWEAK
AccrualsSTRONGGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).