BJ vs CAG — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
BJ and CAG diverge most on short interest (BJ 47 vs 33) and quality (CAG 49 vs 39). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

BJCAG
Metric
BJ
Consumer Defensive
CAG
Consumer Defensive
Framler score
52
[695]
79
[3395]
Verdictmixedbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternSQUEEZE SETUP
Price change-2.37%-1.22%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityWEAKNEUTRAL
ValueWEAKNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODGOOD
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALGOOD
Options flowSTRONGSTRONG
SpilloverNEUTRALNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).