BF.B vs DG — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
BF.B and DG diverge most on accruals (DG 70 vs 50) and PEAD drift (BF.B 78 vs 61). They are most aligned on Q×V×M (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

BF.BDG
Metric
BF.B
Consumer Defensive
DG
Consumer Defensive
Framler score
68
[2295]
62
[1695]
Verdictmixedbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternPEAD DRIFTCONFIRMED BEAT
Price change+1.09%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALGOOD
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumNEUTRALNEUTRAL
PEADSTRONGGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowNEUTRALGOOD
SpilloverNEUTRALNEUTRAL
AccrualsNEUTRALSTRONG
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).