BF.B vs CELH — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
BF.B and CELH diverge most on options flow (CELH 77 vs 50) and PEAD drift (BF.B 78 vs 57). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

BF.BCELH
Metric
BF.B
Consumer Defensive
CELH
Consumer Defensive
Framler score
68
[2295]
54
[895]
Verdictmixedbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternPEAD DRIFT
Price change-1.72%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALGOOD
ValueNEUTRALGOOD
MomentumNEUTRALWEAK
PEADSTRONGGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOOR
Short int.NEUTRALGOOD
Options flowNEUTRALSTRONG
SpilloverNEUTRALNEUTRAL
AccrualsNEUTRALGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKNEUTRAL
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).