AZO vs BBY — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AZO and BBY diverge most on PEAD drift (BBY 78 vs 50) and options flow (AZO 77 vs 53). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AZOBBY
Metric
AZO
Consumer Cyclical
BBY
Consumer Cyclical
Framler score
52
[695]
55
[995]
Verdictmixedbullish
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change+2.15%+2.85%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALGOOD
ValueNEUTRALWEAK
MomentumNEUTRALSTRONG
PEADNEUTRALSTRONG
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALGOOD
Options flowSTRONGNEUTRAL
SpilloverNEUTRALNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).