APD vs CLF — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
APD and CLF diverge most on quality (APD 44 vs 18) and short interest (APD 54 vs 28). They are most aligned on PEAD drift (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

APDCLF
Metric
APD
Materials
CLF
Materials
Framler score
50
[595]
43
[589]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change-0.88%+1.87%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityWEAKPOOR
ValueWEAKNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODWEAK
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALSTRONG
Options flowSTRONGGOOD
SpilloverPOORPOOR
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.POORPOOR
Q × V × MNEUTRALGOOD

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).