APA vs CNR — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
APA and CNR diverge most on quality (APA 83 vs 37) and options flow (APA 79 vs 36). They are most aligned on PEAD drift (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

APACNR
Metric
APA
Energy
CNR
Energy
Framler score
64
[1895]
50
[595]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternSQUEEZE SETUP
Price change-3.89%-0.92%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGWEAK
ValueWEAKGOOD
MomentumGOODGOOD
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALWEAK
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.GOODGOOD
Options flowSTRONGWEAK
SpilloverGOODGOOD
AccrualsSTRONGSTRONG
Sector mom.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).