APA vs CHRD — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
APA and CHRD diverge most on quality (APA 83 vs 35) and value (CHRD 72 vs 42). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

APACHRD
Metric
APA
Energy
CHRD
Energy
Framler score
64
[1895]
61
[1595]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternSQUEEZE SETUPSQUEEZE SETUP
Price change-3.89%-2.74%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGWEAK
ValueWEAKSTRONG
MomentumGOODGOOD
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.GOODGOOD
Options flowSTRONGSTRONG
SpilloverGOODNEUTRAL
AccrualsSTRONGSTRONG
Sector mom.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).