APA vs CEG — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
APA and CEG diverge most on options flow (APA 79 vs 39) and quality (APA 83 vs 45). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

APACEG
Metric
APA
Energy
CEG
Energy
Framler score
64
[1895]
52
[695]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternSQUEEZE SETUP
Price change-3.89%+7.90%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGNEUTRAL
ValueWEAKGOOD
MomentumGOODGOOD
PEADNEUTRALGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.GOODNEUTRAL
Options flowSTRONGWEAK
SpilloverGOODGOOD
AccrualsSTRONGGOOD
Sector mom.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).