AMT vs CSGP — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AMT and CSGP diverge most on quality (AMT 76 vs 32) and value (CSGP 69 vs 28). They are most aligned on NLP tone (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AMTCSGP
Metric
AMT
Real Estate
CSGP
Real Estate
Framler score
59
[1395]
65
[1995]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternCONFIRMED BEAT
Price change+0.56%+0.62%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGWEAK
ValuePOORGOOD
MomentumSTRONGGOOD
PEADNEUTRALGOOD
InsiderWEAKNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowSTRONGGOOD
SpilloverNEUTRALNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.GOODGOOD
Q × V × MWEAKNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).