AMGN vs GILD — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AMGN and GILD diverge most on insider flow (AMGN 50 vs 10) and quality (AMGN 80 vs 57). They are most aligned on spillover (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AMGNGILD
Metric
AMGN
Healthcare
GILD
Healthcare
Framler score
70
[2095]
72
[2295]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternPEAD DRIFTCONFIRMED BEAT
Phase 3 riskPH3·62%PH3·72%
Price change-1.95%-2.82%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGGOOD
ValuePOORWEAK
MomentumSTRONGSTRONG
PEADSTRONGGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALPOOR
NLP tonePOORWEAK
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowNEUTRALNEUTRAL
SpilloverSTRONGSTRONG
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.STRONGSTRONG
Q × V × MGOODGOOD

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).