AMGN vs GILD — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AMGN and GILD diverge most on insider flow (AMGN 44 vs 10) and PEAD drift (AMGN 78 vs 54). They are most aligned on short interest (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AMGNGILD
Metric
AMGN
Healthcare
GILD
Healthcare
Framler score
68
[2295]
55
[995]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeRORO
PatternPEAD DRIFT
Phase 3 riskPH3·85%
Price change+0.25%+0.15%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGSTRONG
ValuePOORWEAK
MomentumSTRONGNEUTRAL
PEADSTRONGNEUTRAL
InsiderWEAKPOOR
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowNEUTRALWEAK
SpilloverSTRONGSTRONG
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.GOODGOOD
Q × V × MWEAKNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).