AMAT vs GFS — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AMAT and GFS diverge most on spillover (AMAT 85 vs 37) and sector momentum (AMAT 85 vs 41). They are most aligned on Q×V×M (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AMATGFS
Metric
AMAT
Semiconductors
GFS
Semiconductors
Framler score
59
[1395]
46
[592]
Verdictbullishbearish
RegimeROTX
Pattern
Price change+4.90%+6.16%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALPOOR
ValueWEAKGOOD
MomentumSTRONGNEUTRAL
PEADNEUTRALSTRONG
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP toneWEAKWEAK
Short int.NEUTRALSTRONG
Options flowGOODWEAK
SpilloverSTRONGWEAK
AccrualsGOODNEUTRAL
Sector mom.STRONGWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).