AM vs CEG — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AM and CEG diverge most on options flow (AM 81 vs 39) and NLP tone (AM 32 vs 0). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AMCEG
Metric
AM
Energy
CEG
Energy
Framler score
58
[1295]
52
[695]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change-1.30%+7.90%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGNEUTRAL
ValueWEAKGOOD
MomentumSTRONGGOOD
PEADWEAKGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP toneWEAKPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowSTRONGWEAK
SpilloverGOODGOOD
AccrualsSTRONGGOOD
Sector mom.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).