AM vs APA — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AM and APA diverge most on NLP tone (AM 32 vs 0) and quality (APA 83 vs 72). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AMAPA
Metric
AM
Energy
APA
Energy
Framler score
58
[1295]
64
[1895]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternSQUEEZE SETUP
Price change-1.30%-3.89%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGSTRONG
ValueWEAKWEAK
MomentumSTRONGGOOD
PEADWEAKNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP toneWEAKPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALGOOD
Options flowSTRONGSTRONG
SpilloverGOODGOOD
AccrualsSTRONGSTRONG
Sector mom.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).