ALL vs AMG — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
ALL and AMG diverge most on NLP tone (AMG 31 vs 0) and momentum (ALL 73 vs 50). They are most aligned on value (within 2 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

ALLAMG
Metric
ALL
Financial Services
AMG
Financial Services
Framler score
64
[1895]
57
[1195]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternCONFIRMED BEATCOMPOUNDER
Price change-1.16%+2.18%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualitySTRONGGOOD
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumSTRONGNEUTRAL
PEADGOODNEUTRAL
InsiderPOORNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORWEAK
Short int.WEAKNEUTRAL
Options flowGOODWEAK
SpilloverWEAKPOOR
AccrualsNEUTRALGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MGOODNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).