AIG vs AMP — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AIG and AMP diverge most on PEAD drift (AMP 78 vs 56) and options flow (AMP 57 vs 35). They are most aligned on NLP tone (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AIGAMP
Metric
AIG
Financial Services
AMP
Financial Services
Framler score
44
[590]
51
[595]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternNO EDGE
Price change+0.64%-1.40%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALSTRONG
ValueNEUTRALWEAK
MomentumWEAKWEAK
PEADGOODSTRONG
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowWEAKGOOD
SpilloverWEAKPOOR
AccrualsNEUTRALGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).