AIG vs ALL — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AIG and ALL diverge most on momentum (ALL 73 vs 34) and options flow (ALL 65 vs 35). They are most aligned on NLP tone (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AIGALL
Metric
AIG
Financial Services
ALL
Financial Services
Framler score
44
[590]
64
[1895]
Verdictmixedbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternNO EDGECONFIRMED BEAT
Price change+0.64%-1.16%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALSTRONG
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumWEAKSTRONG
PEADGOODGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALPOOR
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALWEAK
Options flowWEAKGOOD
SpilloverWEAKWEAK
AccrualsNEUTRALNEUTRAL
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALGOOD

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).