AI vs ALRM — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AI and ALRM diverge most on options flow (AI 81 vs 42) and accruals (AI 95 vs 67). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AIALRM
Metric
AI
Technology
ALRM
Technology
Framler score
88
[4295]
47
[593]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternSQUEEZE SETUP
Price change+5.10%+1.31%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityPOORNEUTRAL
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODWEAK
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.STRONGGOOD
Options flowSTRONGWEAK
SpilloverNEUTRALNEUTRAL
AccrualsSTRONGGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).