AFRM vs C — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AFRM and C diverge most on spillover (C 85 vs 23) and sector momentum (C 81 vs 23). They are most aligned on PEAD drift (within 2 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AFRMC
Metric
AFRM
Financials
C
Financials
Framler score
61
[1595]
36
[582]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeTXRO
PatternSQUEEZE SETUPDIVERGENCE
Price change+2.79%+4.04%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityWEAKGOOD
ValueWEAKGOOD
MomentumSTRONGSTRONG
PEADGOODGOOD
InsiderWEAKWEAK
NLP tonePOOR
Short int.GOODWEAK
Options flowSTRONGNEUTRAL
SpilloverPOORSTRONG
AccrualsSTRONGWEAK
Sector mom.POORSTRONG
Q × V × MNEUTRALGOOD

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).