AFL vs ALL — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AFL and ALL diverge most on NLP tone (AFL 28 vs 0) and momentum (ALL 73 vs 55). They are most aligned on sector momentum (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AFLALL
Metric
AFL
Financial Services
ALL
Financial Services
Framler score
50
[595]
64
[1895]
Verdictmixedbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternCONFIRMED BEAT
Price change-0.49%-1.16%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityNEUTRALSTRONG
ValueGOODNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODSTRONG
PEADNEUTRALGOOD
InsiderPOORPOOR
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALWEAK
Options flowGOODGOOD
SpilloverWEAKWEAK
AccrualsNEUTRALNEUTRAL
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALGOOD

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).