AEP vs CMS — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AEP and CMS diverge most on spillover (AEP 68 vs 50) and quality (AEP 57 vs 44). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AEPCMS
Metric
AEP
Utilities
CMS
Utilities
Framler score
59
[1395]
55
[995]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change-0.04%-0.49%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODWEAK
ValueNEUTRALWEAK
MomentumGOODSTRONG
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALWEAK
Options flowSTRONGSTRONG
SpilloverGOODNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.STRONGSTRONG
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).