ADI vs AMAT — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
ADI and AMAT diverge most on insider flow (AMAT 48 vs 14) and momentum (AMAT 77 vs 52). They are most aligned on spillover (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

ADIAMAT
Metric
ADI
Semiconductors
AMAT
Semiconductors
Framler score
61
[1595]
59
[1395]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeRORO
PatternPIOTROSKI HIGH
Price change-3.92%+4.90%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODNEUTRAL
ValueGOODWEAK
MomentumNEUTRALSTRONG
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderPOORNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORWEAK
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowNEUTRALGOOD
SpilloverSTRONGSTRONG
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.STRONGSTRONG
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).