ACLS vs GFS — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
ACLS and GFS diverge most on PEAD drift (GFS 76 vs 50) and options flow (ACLS 62 vs 41). They are most aligned on Q×V×M (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

ACLSGFS
Metric
ACLS
Semiconductors
GFS
Semiconductors
Framler score
44
[590]
46
[592]
Verdictbearishbearish
RegimeTXTX
Pattern
Price change+4.42%+6.16%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityPOORPOOR
ValueNEUTRALGOOD
MomentumNEUTRALNEUTRAL
PEADNEUTRALSTRONG
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORWEAK
Short int.STRONGSTRONG
Options flowGOODWEAK
SpilloverWEAKWEAK
AccrualsNEUTRALNEUTRAL
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).